Can you tell which is which? If you answered that Image 1 is neutral, you are correct. If your monitor is uncalibrated making everything look bluer than what it is you probably picked Image 2 as the neutrally coloured one. The only way to calibrate your monitor accurately is to buy or borrow a device that measures the colours emitted by your monitor.
They are called colorimetric devices and connect to your computer via the USB port. If you research the topic online you will find articles that tell you how to calibrate your monitor without a colorimetric device.
The only way to do it properly is with the correct device. Colorimetric devices are easy to use, and come with software that guides you through the calibration process. It shows you where to place your device on the screen, then displays a series of colour patches for the device to measure. It then compares the colour values recorded by the device, against the true colour values of the colour patches and creates a profile that compensates for the inaccuracies of the monitor.
Once you have calibrated your monitor you can relax, knowing that the colours you see on your screen are as accurate as your monitor can render them. Mac owners will be fine. The Mac operating system OS X works very well with colour. Every program you use works with the monitor profile and displays accurate colour.
If you have a Windows PC however the story is different. Once this profile is built, it is usually loaded into the OS so that the monitor then displays calibrated image colors. The differences between the product line usually covers how many monitors can be calibrated for each computer to accommodate multi-screen setups.
Sign up to join this community. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top. Stack Overflow for Teams — Collaborate and share knowledge with a private group. Create a free Team What is Teams? Learn more. How does a display calibration device like the Spyder 3 work?
Ask Question. Asked 9 years, 11 months ago. Objectively, no. But it is more than enough for most users, including demanding use cases like display calibration for photographers or designers that need to deliver color accurate work to their clients. The alternatives below that range are simply not worth it and have to make too many compromises in terms of accuracy and longevity to achieve a lower price.
More on it below. The most remarkable quality about this product is that, unlike earlier versions, the new SpyderX has no dealbreakers. It's an easy recommendation for most users and the price is right. Datacolor focused their product development on fixing the most important shortcomings of their previous Spyder5 colorimeter. The new lens design helps the unit to focus more light on the color sensor, improving accuracy on low light readings like dark tones. That was my 1 complaint with the Spyder5.
As a byproduct of that, the new SpyderX is also many times faster. Like on a camera, more light reaching the sensor or film means we can get by with a higher shutter speed. So, what's the obsession with saving a couple of minutes? Well, it makes little sense for me.
I'm a color geek. I enjoy spending half an hour calibrating each of my monitors. But, from an ease of use perspective, faster results are less frustrating and help to reduce the barrier of entry to convince users to calibrate their displays. Another crucial change was to improve measuring accuracy and inter-unit agreement, meaning that different devices will measure more closely between each other. In my own tests, the SpyderX produced color profiles that were virtually indistinguishable from the X-Rite products, either using their respective bundled software or the free DisplayCAL software, which supports most devices on the market and offers more advanced calibration capabilities.
The only area I could see a small difference when switching between profiles was on the most extreme grayscale dark tones below L 12 on the LAB color space. For that display, the SpyderX profile showed a little more banding on the extreme dark tones. Comparing accuracy and raw performance between multiple devices on a scientific way goes beyond my own means of measuring. I prefer to focus my evaluation on actual results. It does everything I need. But, if you're looking for the upmost raw performance, the X-Rite devices still have an edge mainly in terms of low light performance.
This is when I'll pass the mic to the people that specialize not on using their monitor calibrators like myself, but on building the actual tools that make it all work. Tom Huffman, creator of the ChromaPure video calibration software, reviewed the SpyderX and measured raw sensor performance using high-end devices costing thousands of dollars. He concluded that the SpyderX has excellent overall accuracy and repeatability between measurements, although absolute low-light sensitivity still trails behind the X-Rite models.
When it comes to color management systems, Graeme Gill — author of the amazing open source Argyll CMS library — is the person to listen to. In summary, he found the SpyderX to be a good and cheap device, with limitations in terms of low light performance.
This effectively limits the longevity of the device as those corrections can be used to support new types of displays that may appear in the future. Most users will be fine with the less expensive Pro version. The SpyderX colorimeter is available in two versions: Pro and Elite. Both use the same hardware and vary only in software capabilities. Compared to the Pro version, the more expensive Datacolor SpyderX Elite can also calibrate digital projectors and offers additional tools to check the quality of your display, more advanced calibration targets for video standards and tools to match multiple displays in a studio environment.
It can also calibrate digital projectors. Most users calibrating their monitors for photography, illustration, print design or even general computer usage should be covered by the standard calibration presets offered on the Pro model.
The most common calibration target for those use cases is K white point color temperature, 2. Users that require special calibration targets can always switch to DisplayCAL, a free software that is compatible with multiple colorimeter models and offers almost endless calibration options. The i1Display Studio has a small edge over the Datacolor SpyderX Pro in terms of raw performance, specially in deep dark tones. If both units cost the same price on your local market, I'd go for the i1, unless calibration speed is important for your workflow.
In that case, the SpyderX is much faster: less than 2 minutes vs. Our new lens-based technology provides a higher level of color accuracy with more precise screen color, shadow detail and white balance. With SpyderX, you can be sure that what you see is what you get.
Our software is intuitive to use, from quick and easy single-click calibration to even the most advanced control options. I think that SpyderX comes as close to getting it right as you can.
0コメント